"Blowin' in the wind"

How about the government squashed over-unity invention. I know, I know, I'm a crazy half a## scientist right. Well, I got a few thoughts that linger when I think about perpetual motion/over unity. So the basic for believing that over unity is not possible is the scientific theory that matter is neither created or destroyed. Matter equates to energy, so all the energy we have ever had is all the energy we will ever have right. Well then what about this. 1. How did the universe start? Has all the energy in the universe always been there? What would that imply? I think it harder to digest the theory that energy has been here for infinity than it is that energy can be created. If all the matter/energy in the universe has not always been here and there was a big band, then isn't the big bang creating energy, and why couldn't we do that today (create energy)? 2. Many scientists believe that the universe is expanding. What? So if the universe is expanding, the mass of the universe is building so there must be energy that is being created. BTW, I think wind energy is great, but not as great as free energy. The powers that be don't ever want to admit that free energy is possible because it would be the great equalizer. Am I nutz?

http://digits.hrblock.com/ssDigits/digits.php?rType=1&sPath=1665,1672,1691&sNode=1691&uId=279